Player Stats

Trevone Boykin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
12,777
Passing yards
10,728
Rushing yards
2,049
Touchdowns
114

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonTCU00000-
2012 PostseasonTCU1223820137061.3
2012 Regular SeasonTCU122,2331,8533801861.3
2013 Regular SeasonTCU121,5111,1983131450.5
2014 PostseasonTCU1325218765379.7
2014 Regular SeasonTCU134,3563,7146423979.7
2015 Regular SeasonTCU114,1873,5756124074.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

TCU paired 4,608 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 68.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State

Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 54.5th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · TCU

Games

11

Primary Metric / G

380.6

Efficiency

68.6

Usage

27.4

Consistency

77.8

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 338. Stephen F. Austin: 291. SMU: 504. Texas Tech: 527. Texas: 384. Kansas State: 425. Iowa State: 510. West Virginia: 473. Oklahoma State: 518. Kansas: 53. Baylor: 164

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 60 by 63.1. Stephen F. Austin: 30 by 65. SMU: 41 by 75.5. Texas Tech: 68 by 67. Texas: 42 by 77.6. Kansas State: 41 by 80.9. Iowa State: 45 by 85.3. West Virginia: 59 by 78.2. Oklahoma State: 76 by 59.2. Kansas: 10 by 54.7. Baylor: 47 by 47.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins366.9 · Games = 10 · -151.1 vs Losses
Losses518 · Games = 1 · +151.1 vs Wins