Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 2,887 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Utah State | 8 | 74 | 63 | 11 | 1 | 54 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Utah State | 8 | 1,137 | 909 | 228 | 10 | 54 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah State | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 41.8 |
| 2013 Postseason | Arkansas State | 13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 0 | 74.9 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 13 | 2,863 | 2,349 | 514 | 15 | 74.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 2,887 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah State, Arkansas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
222.1
Efficiency
64.4
Usage
30.7
Consistency
67.1
Best Game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 24. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 149. Auburn: 358. Troy: 299. Memphis: 190. Missouri: 344. Idaho: 397. Louisiana: 113. South Alabama: 201. UL Monroe: 337. Texas State: 174. Georgia State: 229. Western Kentucky: 72
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 11 by 50. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 12 by 91.7. Auburn: 54 by 72.4. Troy: 40 by 64.1. Memphis: 53 by 48.9. Missouri: 58 by 62.8. Idaho: 41 by 69.6. Louisiana: 30 by 49. South Alabama: 33 by 73.9. UL Monroe: 45 by 75.3. Texas State: 36 by 60.8. Georgia State: 39 by 69.7. Western Kentucky: 16 by 48.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.