Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2011-2015Western Michigan
Kendrick Roberts
WR • 6'3" • Flint, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kendrick Roberts reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.8
Consistency
39.9
Season Value
45.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Western Michigan
111213141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Western Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendrick Roberts, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Western Michigan. Kendrick Roberts reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kendrick Roberts played WR for Western Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Kendrick Roberts recorded 801 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Western Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Western Michigan paired 354 primary output with 71.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Western Michigan
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
29.3
Efficiency
74.8
Usage
9.3
Consistency
39.9
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 9. Georgia Southern: 10. Miami (OH): 6. Ball State: 42. Bowling Green: 17. Northern Illinois: 74. Toledo: 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 60. Georgia Southern: 1 by 66.7. Miami (OH): 1 by 40. Ball State: 2 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 56.7. Northern Illinois: 4 by 100. Toledo: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins26 · Games = 4 · -7.7 vs Losses
Losses33.7 · Games = 3 · +7.7 vs Wins
First Half16.8 · Games = 4 · -29.3 vs Second Half
Second Half46 · Games = 3 · +29.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/24 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 45-31 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 11/27 | @ Toledo | W 35-30 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Thu 11/19 | @ Northern Illinois | L 19-27 | — | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Thu 11/12 | vs Bowling Green | L 27-41 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/6 | vs Ball State | W 54-7 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Miami (OH) | W 35-13 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Georgia Southern | L 17-43 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Western Michigan
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 45 | 54.7 | 5.1 | 45 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 354 | 71.6 | 16.4 | 309 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 197 | 60.5 | 9.1 | -157 |
| 2015 Postseason | Western Michigan | 205 | 74.8 | 9.3 | 8 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 205 | 74.8 | 9.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northern Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89
Primary metric
89 receiving yards with a 98.9 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Western Michigan
354 primary output · 71.6 efficiency · 16.4 usage
55.2
#2
2015 Postseason · Western Michigan
45.4
205 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Western Michigan
45.4
205 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 9.3 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8056
Southwestern Commencement Academy · Flint, MI
- Committed To
- Western Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
801
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.