Player Stats

Derek Moise College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
187
Receptions
19
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic69113166.4
2012 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic0-00-
2013 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic0-00-
2014 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic71074150.3
2015 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season

Florida Atlantic paired 113 primary output with 71.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 48.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

10.6

Efficiency

48.6

Usage

7.9

Consistency

60.6

Best Game by takeover score

Western Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 10. Tulsa: 13. UTSA: 7. Western Kentucky: 22. Marshall: 17. UAB: -3. North Texas: 8

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 1 by 66.7. Tulsa: 2 by 43.3. UTSA: 1 by 46.7. Western Kentucky: 2 by 73.3. Marshall: 2 by 56.7. UAB: 1 by 0. North Texas: 1 by 53.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins14 · Games = 3 · +6 vs Losses
Losses8 · Games = 4 · -6 vs Wins