Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2025-2025Washington
Raiden Vines-Bright
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Tempe, AZ, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Raiden Vines-Bright reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
54.5
Consistency
35.3
Season Value
50.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Washington
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Washington
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Raiden Vines-Bright, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Washington. Raiden Vines-Bright reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Raiden Vines-Bright played WR for Washington. Across 1 tracked season, Raiden Vines-Bright recorded 1 rushing yards, 238 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Washington.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Washington paired 238 primary output with 54.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 54.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Washington
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
19.8
Efficiency
54.5
Usage
10.6
Consistency
35.3
Best Game by takeover score
Boise State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boise State: 3. Colorado State: 0. Unknown: 52. Washington State: 5. Ohio State: 10. Maryland: 29. Rutgers: 50. Michigan: 35. Illinois: 28. Wisconsin: 6. Purdue: 11. Oregon: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boise State: 1 by 20. Unknown: 2 by 100. Washington State: 1 by 33.3. Ohio State: 2 by 33.3. Maryland: 3 by 64.4. Rutgers: 3 by 100. Michigan: 3 by 77.8. Illinois: 4 by 46.7. Wisconsin: 1 by 40. Purdue: 3 by 24.4. Oregon: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins18 · Games = 7 · +3 vs Losses
Losses15 · Games = 4 · -3 vs Wins
First Half16.5 · Games = 6 · -6.7 vs Second Half
Second Half23.2 · Games = 6 · +6.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rutgers
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/14 | vs Boise State | W 38-10 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Oregon | L 14-26 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Purdue | W 49-13 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Wisconsin | L 10-13 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Illinois | W 42-25 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Michigan | L 7-24 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rutgers | W 38-19 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Maryland | W 24-20 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Ohio State | L 6-24 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Washington State | W 59-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 52 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 45 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Colorado State | W 38-21 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Washington | 238 | 54.5 | 10.6 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Washington | 238 | 54.5 | 10.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50
Primary metric
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
52
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#4
Maryland
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Washington
238 primary output · 54.5 efficiency · 10.6 usage
50.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · Washington
50.1
238 primary · 54.5 efficiency · 10.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8894
IMG Academy · Tempe, AZ
- Committed To
- Washington
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
238
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 12 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.