Usage Score
9.9
Player Dossier
2025-2025Alabama
Marshall Pritchett
TE • 6'5" • 248 lbs • Charleston, SC, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Marshall Pritchett reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
58.3
Consistency
48.1
Season Value
53.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Alabama
25
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marshall Pritchett, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Alabama. Marshall Pritchett reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Alabama paired 57 primary output with 58.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 58.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Alabama
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
19
Efficiency
58.3
Usage
9.9
Consistency
48.1
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UL Monroe: 12. Unknown: 33. Georgia: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UL Monroe: 2 by 40. Unknown: 4 by 55. Georgia: 1 by 80
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
First Half22.5 · Games = 2
All Games19 · Games = 3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
80 vs Georgia
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Alabama | 57 | 58.3 | 9.9 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
33
Primary metric
33 receiving yards with a 55 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Alabama
57 primary output · 58.3 efficiency · 9.9 usage
53.2
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.9075
Rabun Gap-Nacoochee · Rabun Gap, GA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
57
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 3 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.