Usage Score
20.3
Player Dossier
2025-2025West Virginia
Scotty Fox Jr.
QB • 6'2" • 213 lbs • Mentor, OH, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Scotty Fox Jr. is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
57.9
Consistency
39
Season Value
54.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · West Virginia
25
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- West Virginia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Scotty Fox Jr., QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · West Virginia. Scotty Fox Jr. is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Scotty Fox Jr. played QB for West Virginia. Across 1 tracked season, Scotty Fox Jr. recorded 1,276 passing yards, 201 rushing yards, and 10 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with West Virginia.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
West Virginia paired 1,477 primary output with 57.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 57.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Loss with 360 yards of offense and 61.9 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · West Virginia
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
147.7
Efficiency
57.9
Usage
20.3
Consistency
39
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 71. Pittsburgh: 58. Utah: 5. BYU: 76. UCF: 49. TCU: 287. Houston: 222. Colorado: 260. Arizona State: 360. Texas Tech: 89
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 91.7. Pittsburgh: 10 by 32.1. Utah: 2 by 25. BYU: 5 by 100. UCF: 28 by 40. TCU: 52 by 57.4. Houston: 32 by 70.9. Colorado: 45 by 56.6. Arizona State: 47 by 61.9. Texas Tech: 30 by 43.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins180 · Games = 3 · +35.7 vs Losses
Losses144.3 · Games = 6 · -35.7 vs Wins
First Half51.8 · Games = 5 · -191.8 vs Second Half
Second Half243.6 · Games = 5 · +191.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs BYU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Texas Tech | L 0-49 | 13 | 23 | 98 | 56.5 | 0 | 1 | 43.7 | 7 | -9 | -1.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Arizona State300-yard game | L 23-25 | 19 | 31 | 353 | 61.3 | 2 | 1 | 61.9 | 16 | 7 | 0.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs ColoradoDual-threat | W 29-22 | 17 | 28 | 202 | 60.7 | 1 | 2 | 56.6 | 17 | 58 | 3.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Houston3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 45-35 | 13 | 22 | 157 | 59.1 | 1 | 0 | 70.9 | 10 | 65 | 6.50 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs TCU300-yard game | L 17-23 | 28 | 41 | 301 | 68.3 | 2 | 0 | 57.4 | 11 | -14 | -1.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ UCF | L 13-45 | 6 | 17 | 47 | 35.3 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 11 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ BYU | L 24-38 | 3 | 3 | 54 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 100 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Utah | L 14-48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Pittsburgh | W 31-24 | 1 | 4 | 56 | 25.0 | 0 | 2 | 32.1 | 6 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UnknownDual-threat | — | 1 | 1 | 8 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 91.7 | 2 | 63 | 31.50 | 1 | 59 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
West Virginia
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | West Virginia | 1,477 | 57.9 | 20.3 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Loss with 360 yards of offense and 61.9 efficiency.
360
Primary metric
360 total offense with 61.9 efficiency.
#2
TCU
287
Primary metric
Loss with 287 yards of offense and 57.4 efficiency.
287 total offense with 57.4 efficiency.
#3
Colorado
260
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
260 total offense with 56.6 efficiency.
#4
Houston
222
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
222 total offense with 70.9 efficiency.
#5
BYU
76
Primary metric
Loss with 76 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
76 total offense with 100 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · West Virginia
1,477 primary output · 57.9 efficiency · 20.3 usage
54.1
Milestones
3
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
4
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8694
Mentor · Mentor, OH
- Committed To
- West Virginia
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
1,477
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 10 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.