Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Stanford paired 958 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Stanford | 12 | 7 | 120 | 1 | 44.6 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 12 | 17 | 230 | 3 | 44.6 |
| 2012 Postseason | Stanford | 9 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 47.8 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 9 | 23 | 187 | 0 | 47.8 |
| 2013 Postseason | Stanford | 14 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 85.7 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 14 | 58 | 937 | 14 | 85.7 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 11 | 61 | 604 | 6 | 72.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Stanford paired 958 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
54.9
Efficiency
67
Usage
27.7
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UC Davis: 77. USC: 83. Army: 86. Washington: 29. Notre Dame: 12. Washington State: 72. Arizona State: 82. Oregon State: 73. Oregon: 35. Utah: 41. California: 14
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UC Davis: 5 by 100. USC: 9 by 61.5. Army: 8 by 71.7. Washington: 4 by 48.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 20. Washington State: 7 by 68.6. Arizona State: 6 by 91.1. Oregon State: 6 by 81.1. Oregon: 7 by 33.3. Utah: 4 by 68.3. California: 1 by 93.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.