Player Stats

Ty Montgomery College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,125
Receptions
172
Touchdowns
24

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 PostseasonStanford127120144.6
2011 Regular SeasonStanford1217230344.6
2012 PostseasonStanford9326047.8
2012 Regular SeasonStanford923187047.8
2013 PostseasonStanford14321085.7
2013 Regular SeasonStanford14589371485.7
2014 Regular SeasonStanford1161604672.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Stanford paired 958 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Stanford

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

54.9

Efficiency

67

Usage

27.7

Consistency

68.1

Best Game by takeover score

Arizona State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UC Davis: 77. USC: 83. Army: 86. Washington: 29. Notre Dame: 12. Washington State: 72. Arizona State: 82. Oregon State: 73. Oregon: 35. Utah: 41. California: 14

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UC Davis: 5 by 100. USC: 9 by 61.5. Army: 8 by 71.7. Washington: 4 by 48.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 20. Washington State: 7 by 68.6. Arizona State: 6 by 91.1. Oregon State: 6 by 81.1. Oregon: 7 by 33.3. Utah: 4 by 68.3. California: 1 by 93.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins58.5 · Games = 6 · +7.9 vs Losses
Losses50.6 · Games = 5 · -7.9 vs Wins