Usage Score
27.7
Player Dossier
2011-2014Stanford
Ty Montgomery
WR • 6'2" • Dallas, TX, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Ty Montgomery reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67
Consistency
68.1
Season Value
54.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Stanford
11111212131314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ty Montgomery, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Stanford. Ty Montgomery reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Stanford paired 958 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Stanford
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
54.9
Efficiency
67
Usage
27.7
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
California
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 77. USC: 83. Army: 86. Washington: 29. Notre Dame: 12. Washington State: 72. Arizona State: 82. Oregon State: 73. Oregon: 35. Utah: 41. California: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 100. USC: 9 by 61.5. Army: 8 by 71.7. Washington: 4 by 48.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 20. Washington State: 7 by 68.6. Arizona State: 6 by 91.1. Oregon State: 6 by 81.1. Oregon: 7 by 33.3. Utah: 4 by 68.3. California: 1 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins54.8 · n=5 · +4.2 vs Losses
Losses50.6 · n=5 · -4.2 vs Wins
First Half59.8 · n=6 · +10.8 vs Second Half
Second Half49 · n=5 · -10.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | @ California | W 38-17 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Utah | L 17-20 | — | 4 | 41 | 8.4 | 10.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Oregon | L 16-45 | — | 7 | 35 | 6.1 | 5 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oregon State | W 38-14 | — | 6 | 73 | 11.1 | 12.20 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/19 | @ Arizona State | L 10-26 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Washington State | W 34-17 | — | 7 | 72 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-17 | — | 4 | 12 | 2.9 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Washington | W 20-13 | — | 4 | 29 | 9.6 | 7.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs ArmyHigh volume | W 35-0 | — | 8 | 86 | 9.3 | 10.80 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs USCHigh volume | L 10-13 | — | 9 | 83 | 7.7 | 9.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 77 | 14.2 | 15.40 | 1 | 44 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201120122012201320132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Stanford | 350 | 75.1 | 14.7 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 350 | 75.1 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Stanford | 213 | 51.2 | 16.3 | -137 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 213 | 51.2 | 16.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Stanford | 958 | 83.6 | 32.8 | 745 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 958 | 83.6 | 32.8 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 604 | 67 | 27.7 | -354 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
131
Primary metric
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Army
130
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oklahoma State
120
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
California
160
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Stanford
958 primary output · 83.6 efficiency · 32.8 usage
65.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Stanford
65.4
958 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 32.8 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Stanford
54.3
604 primary · 67 efficiency · 27.7 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9057
St. Mark's · Dallas, TX
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,125
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.