Player Stats

Charlie Hopkins College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
100
Receptions
13
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonStanford0-00-
2012 Regular SeasonStanford0-00-
2013 Regular SeasonStanford2210039.2
2014 Regular SeasonStanford0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonVirginia71190253.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Virginia paired 90 primary output with 49.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 49.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Stanford, Virginia.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Virginia

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

12.9

Efficiency

49.5

Usage

7.4

Consistency

39.2

Best Game by takeover score

North Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 8. Notre Dame: 5. Boise State: 14. Syracuse: 2. North Carolina: 36. Miami: 4. Duke: 21

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 1 by 53.3. Notre Dame: 1 by 33.3. Boise State: 1 by 93.3. Syracuse: 1 by 13.3. North Carolina: 3 by 80. Miami: 1 by 26.7. Duke: 3 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins11.5 · Games = 2 · -1.9 vs Losses
Losses13.4 · Games = 5 · +1.9 vs Wins