Player Stats

Jacob Godfrey College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
462
Receptions
41
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonNew Mexico116040.2
2024 Regular SeasonUL Monroe1024265263.9
2025 Regular SeasonUL Monroe1116191259.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

UL Monroe paired 265 primary output with 56.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 63.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across New Mexico, UL Monroe.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · UL Monroe

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

17.4

Efficiency

63.1

Usage

15.2

Consistency

51.2

Best Game by takeover score

UTEP

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. St. Francis (PA): 22. Alabama: -1. UTEP: 49. Arkansas State: 40. Northwestern: 26. Coastal Carolina: 0. Troy: 33. Old Dominion: 17. South Alabama: 5. Texas State: 0. Louisiana: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. St. Francis (PA): 2 by 73.3. Alabama: 1 by 0. UTEP: 2 by 100. Arkansas State: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 2 by 86.7. Troy: 3 by 73.3. Old Dominion: 3 by 37.8. South Alabama: 1 by 33.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins37 · Games = 3 · +27 vs Losses
Losses10 · Games = 8 · -27 vs Wins