Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2011-2013Utah
RB • 5'8" • Sugar Land, TX, USA
Jarrell Oliver leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Usage Score
10.2
Efficiency
23.9
Consistency
59.6
Season Value
48
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Utah
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jarrell Oliver, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Utah. Jarrell Oliver leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Jarrell Oliver played RB for Utah. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jarrell Oliver recorded 52 rushing yards and -1 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Utah.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Utah paired 51 primary output with 23.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 23.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Win with 23 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
12.8
Efficiency
23.9
Usage
10.2
Consistency
59.6
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 20. Utah State: 3. BYU: 23. Washington State: 5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 7 by 29.8. Utah State: 1 by 31.3. BYU: 12 by 21.6. Washington State: 4 by 13
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
31.3 vs Utah State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah | 51 | 23.9 | 10.2 | 51 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | -51 |
#1 Featured game
BYU
Win with 23 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
23
Primary metric
23 scrimmage yards and 22.6 usage.
#2
Unknown
20
Primary metric
Game with 20 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
20 scrimmage yards and 10.3 usage.
#3
Utah State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
3 scrimmage yards and 1.7 usage.
#4
Washington State
5
Primary metric
Win with 5 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
5 scrimmage yards and 6.2 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Utah
51 primary output · 23.9 efficiency · 10.2 usage
48
#2
2011 Regular Season · Utah
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Utah
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8737
DeSmet · St. Louis, MO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
51
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.