Player Stats

Chris Johnson Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
837
Rushing yards
583
Receiving yards
254
Touchdowns
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonMiami375732137.5
2024 Regular SeasonMiami101033172216.8
2025 PostseasonSMU1320164058.8
2025 Regular SeasonSMU13639463176558.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

SMU paired 659 primary output with 55.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami, SMU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: California

Loss with 131 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · SMU

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

50.7

Efficiency

55.8

Usage

12

Consistency

45.2

Best Game by takeover score

California

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 20. East Texas A&M: 44. Baylor: 52. Missouri State: 76. TCU: 40. Syracuse: -2. Stanford: 138. Clemson: 99. Wake Forest: 30. Miami: 2. Boston College: 0. Louisville: 29. California: 131

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 6 by 33.9. East Texas A&M: 6 by 76.4. Baylor: 8 by 49. Missouri State: 7 by 93.2. TCU: 7 by 47.6. Syracuse: 1 by 0. Stanford: 7 by 100. Clemson: 10 by 91.3. Wake Forest: 9 by 36.5. Miami: 5 by 4.8. Louisville: 7 by 37.1. California: 11 by 99.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins45.1 · Games = 9 · -18.1 vs Losses
Losses63.3 · Games = 4 · +18.1 vs Wins