Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2023-2025Baylor
DJ Coleman
S • 6'1" • 210 lbs • Mesquite, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
DJ Coleman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.6
Consistency
36.7
Season Value
22.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Baylor
23242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Baylor
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DJ Coleman, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Baylor. DJ Coleman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Baylor paired 10 primary output with 22.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 22.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Baylor
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
22.6
Usage
8.3
Consistency
36.7
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 0. SMU: 1. Unknown: 2. Arizona State: 1. Oklahoma State: 1. Kansas State: 0. TCU: 0. Cincinnati: 0. UCF: 2. Utah: 0. Arizona: 3. Houston: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 3 by 12.5. SMU: 6 by 35. Unknown: 1 by 24.2. Arizona State: 3 by 22.5. Oklahoma State: 5 by 30.8. Kansas State: 4 by 16.7. TCU: 4 by 16.7. Cincinnati: 4 by 16.7. UCF: 6 by 45. Utah: 2 by 8.3. Arizona: 2 by 38.3. Houston: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 4 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 7 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · Games = 6 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 6 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
45 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Houston | L 24-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ ArizonaSplash game | L 17-41 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Utah | L 28-55 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs UCF | W 30-3 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Cincinnati | L 20-41 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ TCU | L 36-42 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Kansas State | W 35-34 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Oklahoma State | W 45-27 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Arizona State | L 24-27 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ SMU | W 48-45 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Auburn | L 24-38 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Baylor
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Baylor | 2 | 11.8 | 1.7 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Baylor | 3.5 | 15.2 | 4.2 | 1.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Baylor | 3.5 | 15.2 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Baylor | 10 | 22.6 | 8.3 | 6.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
#2
LSU
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
#3
Utah
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
#4
UCF
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
#5
UCF
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Baylor
10 primary output · 22.6 efficiency · 8.3 usage
22.8
#2
2024 Postseason · Baylor
8.6
3.5 primary · 15.2 efficiency · 4.2 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Baylor
8.6
3.5 primary · 15.2 efficiency · 4.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8706
Horn · Mesquite, TX
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
84
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 29 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.