Usage Score
3.1
Player Dossier
2011-2014Arkansas State
Stephen Hogan
QB • 6'4" • Greenwood, AR, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Stephen Hogan is a balanced quarterback profile with 3.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58.6
Consistency
8.3
Season Value
42
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Arkansas State
11121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Arkansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Stephen Hogan, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Arkansas State. Stephen Hogan is a balanced quarterback profile with 3.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stephen Hogan played QB for Arkansas State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Stephen Hogan recorded 18 passing yards and 34 rushing yards. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Arkansas State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Arkansas State paired 52 primary output with 58.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 58.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 31 yards of offense and 100 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Arkansas State
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
6.5
Efficiency
58.6
Usage
3.1
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 31. UL Monroe: 3. Georgia State: 19. Louisiana: 0. South Alabama: 0. App State: 0. Texas State: 0. New Mexico State: -1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. UL Monroe: 1 by 30. Georgia State: 4 by 63.2. South Alabama: 1 by 33.3. New Mexico State: 1 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins5.3 · Games = 4 · +5.3 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -5.3 vs Wins
First Half13.3 · Games = 4 · +13.5 vs Second Half
Second Half-0.3 · Games = 4 · -13.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs New Mexico State | W 68-35 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 66.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/21 | @ Texas State | L 27-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs App State | L 32-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs South Alabama | W 45-10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 10/22 | @ Louisiana | L 40-55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Georgia State | W 52-10 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 63.2 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs UL Monroe | W 28-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 2 | 31 | 15.50 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 52 | 58.6 | 3.1 | 52 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 31 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
31
Primary metric
31 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#2
Georgia State
19
Primary metric
Win with 19 yards of offense and 63.2 efficiency.
19 total offense with 63.2 efficiency.
#3
New Mexico State
-1
Primary metric
Win with -1 yards of offense and 66.7 efficiency.
-1 total offense with 66.7 efficiency.
#4
South Alabama
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 yards of offense and 33.3 efficiency.
0 total offense with 33.3 efficiency.
#5
UL Monroe
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 yards of offense and 30 efficiency.
3 total offense with 30 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Arkansas State
52 primary output · 58.6 efficiency · 3.1 usage
42
#2
2011 Regular Season · Arkansas State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Arkansas State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
3
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
Greenwood · Greenwood, AR
- Committed To
- Arkansas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
52
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.