Usage Score
32.2
Player Dossier
2011-2015Texas Tech
DeAndre Washington
RB • 5'8" • Missouri City, TX, USA
Workhorse runnerBig-play efficiency
DeAndre Washington leans workhorse runner traits and 65.4 efficiency.
Efficiency
65.4
Consistency
68.5
Season Value
66.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Texas Tech
11121313141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeAndre Washington, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Texas Tech. DeAndre Washington leans workhorse runner traits and 65.4 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 1,877 primary output with 65.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 65.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
144.4
Efficiency
65.4
Usage
32.2
Consistency
68.5
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 118. Unknown: 88. UTEP: 147. Arkansas: 91. TCU: 219. Baylor: 80. Iowa State: 120. Kansas: 160. Oklahoma: 106. Oklahoma State: 111. West Virginia: 166. Kansas State: 284. Texas: 187
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 17 by 52. Unknown: 15 by 60. UTEP: 13 by 97.1. Arkansas: 14 by 69.7. TCU: 25 by 86.5. Baylor: 18 by 37.3. Iowa State: 16 by 68.8. Kansas: 25 by 69.3. Oklahoma: 20 by 53. Oklahoma State: 24 by 46.3. West Virginia: 27 by 56. Kansas State: 31 by 88.2. Texas: 29 by 65.5
Split Comparison
Wins164.8 · n=6 · +31.5 vs Losses
Losses133.3 · n=6 · -31.5 vs Wins
First Half123.3 · n=7 · -45.7 vs Second Half
Second Half169 · n=6 · +45.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
97.1 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/30 | vs LSU | L 27-56 | 10 | 37 | 3.70 | 0 | 7 | 81 | 6.9 |
| Fri 11/27 | @ Texas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 48-45 | 28 | 173 | 6.20 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 6.4 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Kansas State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 59-44 | 27 | 248 | 9.20 | 3 | 4 | 36 | 9.2 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ West Virginia100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 26-31 | 21 | 102 | 4.90 | 0 | 6 | 64 | 6.1 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Oklahoma State | L 53-70 | 22 | 95 | 4.30 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 4.6 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Oklahoma | L 27-63 | 19 | 94 | 4.90 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Kansas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 30-20 | 23 | 157 | 6.80 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Iowa State2+ TD | W 66-31 | 12 | 72 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 48 | 7.5 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Baylor | L 35-63 | 13 | 39 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 41 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs TCU100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 52-55 | 22 | 188 | 8.50 | 4 | 3 | 31 | 8.8 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Arkansas | W 35-24 | 11 | 75 | 6.80 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 6.5 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs UTEP100 rush yards | W 69-20 | 12 | 138 | 11.50 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11.3 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | 13 | 74 | 5.70 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 5.9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220132013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 475 | 46.3 | 15.1 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | -475 |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas Tech | 719 | 45.7 | 18.1 | 719 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 719 | 45.7 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 1,431 | 61.9 | 31.5 | 712 |
| 2015 Postseason | Texas Tech | 1,877 | 65.4 | 32.2 | 446 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 1,877 | 65.4 | 32.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
237
Primary metric
237 scrimmage yards and 36.1 usage.
#2
Kansas State
284
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
284 scrimmage yards and 42.5 usage.
#3
TCU
219
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
219 scrimmage yards and 40.3 usage.
#4
Kansas
185
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
185 scrimmage yards and 39.1 usage.
#5
Iowa State
101
Primary metric
Win with 101 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
101 scrimmage yards and 18.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Texas Tech
1,877 primary output · 65.4 efficiency · 32.2 usage
66.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Texas Tech
66.5
1,877 primary · 65.4 efficiency · 32.2 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Texas Tech
59.1
1,431 primary · 61.9 efficiency · 31.5 usage
Milestones
17
100+ rush yards
9
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8905
Fort Bend Marshall · Missouri City, TX
- Committed To
- Texas Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
4,502
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.