Player Stats

Tyler Higbee College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,054
Receptions
68
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky2292152.8
2012 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky0-00-
2013 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky513169155.8
2014 PostseasonWestern Kentucky614047.1
2014 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky614226447.1
2015 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky938563874.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Western Kentucky paired 563 primary output with 80.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 80.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Western Kentucky

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

62.6

Efficiency

80.2

Usage

14.6

Consistency

69.2

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 102. Louisiana Tech: 88. Indiana: 109. Miami (OH): 55. Rice: 54. Middle Tennessee: 51. North Texas: 4. Marshall: 92. Southern Miss: 8

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 4 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 83.8. Indiana: 11 by 66.1. Miami (OH): 4 by 91.7. Rice: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 100. North Texas: 1 by 26.7. Marshall: 6 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 53.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins56.8 · Games = 8 · -52.3 vs Losses
Losses109 · Games = 1 · +52.3 vs Wins