Player Stats

Orville Reynolds College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
524
Rushing yards
309
Receiving yards
215
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 PostseasonWake Forest5880044.9
2011 Regular SeasonWake Forest512610125044.9
2012 Regular SeasonWake Forest6-10-6-4030.8
2013 Regular SeasonWake Forest520236166260.8
2014 Regular SeasonWake Forest919817028055

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Wake Forest paired 202 primary output with 64.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 22.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Gardner-Webb

Win with 67 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest

Games

9

Scrimmage Yards / G

22

Efficiency

22.6

Usage

18.3

Consistency

47.3

Best Game by takeover score

Gardner-Webb

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UL Monroe: 36. Gardner-Webb: 67. Utah State: -6. Army: 52. Louisville: 19. Florida State: 3. Syracuse: 0. Clemson: 20. NC State: 7

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UL Monroe: 17 by 23.3. Gardner-Webb: 20 by 33.8. Utah State: 5 by 0. Army: 9 by 73. Louisville: 10 by 15.1. Florida State: 8 by 3.9. Syracuse: 1 by 0. Clemson: 7 by 29.8. NC State: 3 by 24.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins59.5 · Games = 2 · +48.2 vs Losses
Losses11.3 · Games = 7 · -48.2 vs Wins