Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Memphis paired 1,767 primary output with 54.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Memphis | 11 | 1,767 | 1,690 | 77 | 12 | 66.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Memphis paired 1,767 primary output with 54.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 54.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Austin Peay
Win with 361 yards of offense and 82.8 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
160.6
Efficiency
54.3
Usage
20.8
Consistency
65.8
Best Game by takeover score
Austin Peay
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 153. Arkansas State: 80. Austin Peay: 361. SMU: 141. Middle Tennessee: 249. Rice: 129. East Carolina: 40. Tulane: 215. UCF: 91. UAB: 202. Marshall: 106
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 40 by 49.4. Arkansas State: 38 by 42.5. Austin Peay: 34 by 82.8. SMU: 39 by 48.2. Middle Tennessee: 38 by 67.4. Rice: 38 by 46.8. East Carolina: 15 by 44.6. Tulane: 36 by 52.2. UCF: 26 by 46.4. UAB: 35 by 65.4. Marshall: 25 by 51.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.