Usage / Role
60%
Regular offensive contributor
Player Dossier
2025-2025Washington State
RB • 5'11" • 208 lbs • Lutz, FL, USA
Kirby Vorhees leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.9 efficiency.
Usage / Role
60%
Regular offensive contributor
Impact Production
51
Solid production for a back
Reliability
48
Useful contributor with volatile peaks
Star Power
55
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Washington State
Snapshot
Player Story
Kirby Vorhees built his college career in 2025 as a running back from Lutz, FL wearing No. 9, spending time with Washington State. The clearest part of Kirby Vorhees' career was his backfield work: 576 rushing yards,...
Read the storyKirby Vorhees, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · Washington State. Kirby Vorhees leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.9 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Washington State | 12 | 701 | 576 | 125 | 5 | 73.5 |
Related Context
Transfer Portal History
| Season | Path | Movement | Value | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Washington State to Unlisted | G5/FCS to Unlisted | 9 | Dec 18, 2025 |
| 2025 | Unlisted to Washington State | Unlisted to G5/FCS | 76.8 | Dec 31, 2024 |
Kirby Vorhees played RB for Washington State. Across 1 tracked season, Kirby Vorhees recorded 576 rushing yards, 125 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Washington State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Washington State paired 701 primary output with 44.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 44.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Loss with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
58.4
Efficiency
44.9
Usage
24.9
Consistency
77.9
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 37. San Diego State: 67. North Texas: 32. Washington: 29. Colorado State: 43. Ole Miss: 90. Virginia: 55. Toledo: 62. Oregon State: 70. Louisiana Tech: 88. James Madison: 61. Oregon State: 67
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Idaho: 11 by 33.8. San Diego State: 13 by 53.7. North Texas: 8 by 51. Washington: 7 by 33.5. Colorado State: 11 by 35. Ole Miss: 11 by 84.1. Virginia: 17 by 31.1. Toledo: 15 by 43.1. Oregon State: 12 by 53.1. Louisiana Tech: 18 by 50.1. James Madison: 19 by 33.4. Oregon State: 15 by 37.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
84.1 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Oregon State | W 32-8 | 14 | 42 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 4.5 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ James Madison | L 20-24 | 19 | 61 | 3.20 | 0 | — | — | 3.2 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 28-3 | 16 | 76 | 4.80 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 4.9 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Oregon State | L 7-10 | 10 | 46 | 4.60 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 5.8 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Toledo | W 28-7 | 15 | 62 | 4.10 | 1 | — | — | 4.1 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Virginia | L 20-22 | 16 | 45 | 2.80 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 3.2 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Ole Miss | L 21-24 | 10 | 88 | 8.80 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8.2 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Colorado State | W 20-3 | 8 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 19 | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Washington | L 24-59 | 5 | 13 | 2.60 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 4.1 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ North Texas | L 10-59 | 6 | 33 | 5.50 | 0 | 2 | -1 | 4 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs San Diego State | W 36-13 | 13 | 67 | 5.20 | 0 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Idaho | W 13-10 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 3.4 |
Player Story
Kirby Vorhees built his college career in 2025 as a running back from Lutz, FL wearing No. 9, spending time with Washington State. The clearest part of Kirby Vorhees' career was his backfield work: 576 rushing yards, 138 carries, 5 rushing touchdowns, and 125 receiving yards across 13 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2025 with Washington State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 125 receiving yards and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 13 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Washington State.
The arc is straightforward: Kirby Vorhees moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Washington State
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Washington State | 701 | 44.9 | 24.9 | — |
#1 Featured game
@ No. 7 Ole Miss
Week 7 · L 21-24 · Ranked opponent
Loss with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
90
Scrimmage Yards
81.6 takeover
90 scrimmage yards and 21.2 usage.
#2
vs No. 77 Louisiana Tech
Week 12 · W 28-3
88
Scrimmage Yards
79.9 takeover
Win with 88 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
88 scrimmage yards and 32.1 usage.
#3
@ Oklahoma State
Week 1
7
Scrimmage Yards
68.3 takeover
Game with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7 scrimmage yards and — usage.
#4
@ No. 126 Oregon State
Week 10 · L 7-10 · Conference game
70
Scrimmage Yards
67.4 takeover
Loss with 70 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
70 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#5
@ No. 27 James Madison
Week 13 · L 20-24
61
Scrimmage Yards
66 takeover
Loss with 61 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
61 scrimmage yards and 33.9 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · Washington State
701 primary output · 44.9 efficiency · 24.9 usage
73.5
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.