Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2012Illinois
WR • 6'4" • Detroit, MI, USA
Kenny Knight reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
16
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
7
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
24
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Illinois
Snapshot
Kenny Knight, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Illinois. Kenny Knight reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Illinois | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | Illinois | 3 | 5 | 52 | 0 | 61.5 |
Related Context
Kenny Knight played WR for Illinois. Across 2 tracked seasons, Kenny Knight recorded 52 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Illinois.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Illinois paired 52 primary output with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
17.3
Efficiency
71.1
Usage
6.9
Consistency
51.9
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 9. Charleston Southern: 13. Penn State: 30
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 1 by 60. Charleston Southern: 1 by 86.7. Penn State: 3 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
86.7 vs Charleston Southern
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Illinois
2011-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Illinois | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Illinois | 52 | 71.1 | 6.9 | 52 |
#1 Featured game
vs Penn State
Week 5 · L 7-35 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30
Receiving Yards
67 takeover
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#2
vs Charleston Southern
Week 3 · W 44-0
13
Receiving Yards
47 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
@ Arizona State
Week 2 · L 14-45
9
Receiving Yards
37.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Illinois
52 primary output · 71.1 efficiency · 6.9 usage
61.5
#2
2011 Regular Season · Illinois
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.