Player Stats

Donovonn Young College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,099
Rushing yards
1,777
Receiving yards
322
Touchdowns
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 PostseasonIllinois124445-1050.9
2011 Regular SeasonIllinois1242240616650.9
2012 Regular SeasonIllinois12743571172468.2
2013 Regular SeasonIllinois1141937643350.6
2014 PostseasonIllinois131618-2154.9
2014 Regular SeasonIllinois1345536194554.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

Illinois paired 743 primary output with 42.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 42.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Penn State

Win with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Illinois

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

36.2

Efficiency

42.5

Usage

16.6

Consistency

66.3

Best Game by takeover score

Penn State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 16. Youngstown State: 48. Western Kentucky: 47. Washington: 30. Texas State: 62. Nebraska: 24. Purdue: 34. Wisconsin: 6. Minnesota: 32. Ohio State: 22. Iowa: 25. Penn State: 74. Northwestern: 51

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 27.1. Youngstown State: 12 by 43.8. Western Kentucky: 14 by 35. Washington: 6 by 52.1. Texas State: 13 by 33.1. Nebraska: 6 by 37.9. Purdue: 10 by 36.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 20.8. Minnesota: 4 by 83.3. Ohio State: 8 by 28.6. Iowa: 5 by 52.1. Penn State: 16 by 46.9. Northwestern: 11 by 54.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins52.3 · Games = 6 · +29.9 vs Losses
Losses22.4 · Games = 7 · -29.9 vs Wins