Usage Score
17.3
Player Dossier
2011-2015Florida State
QB • 6'0" • Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Everett Golson is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
17.3
Efficiency
57.4
Consistency
67.9
Season Value
47.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Everett Golson, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Notre Dame. Everett Golson is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Everett Golson played QB for Notre Dame and Florida State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Everett Golson recorded 7,628 passing yards, 546 rushing yards, and 66 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Notre Dame.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 3,728 primary output with 61.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 57.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Notre Dame, Florida State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Win with 344 yards of offense and 62.5 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
193.7
Efficiency
57.4
Usage
17.3
Consistency
67.9
Best Game by takeover score
Unknown
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 301. South Florida: 148. Boston College: 124. Wake Forest: 206. Miami: 305. Louisville: 344. Georgia Tech: 198. NC State: 52. Unknown: 65
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 29 by 69. South Florida: 34 by 51.5. Boston College: 30 by 53. Wake Forest: 38 by 56.1. Miami: 39 by 68.1. Louisville: 43 by 62.5. Georgia Tech: 37 by 52.9. NC State: 12 by 28.7. Unknown: 4 by 75
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
75 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/21 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 3 | 67 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 1 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs NC State | W 34-17 | 5 | 9 | 52 | 55.6 | 0 | 2 | 28.7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Georgia Tech | L 16-22 | 20 | 30 | 210 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | 52.9 | 7 | -12 | -1.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Louisville300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 41-21 | 26 | 38 | 372 | 68.4 | 3 | 0 | 62.5 | 5 | -28 | -5.60 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs Miami | W 29-24 | 25 | 33 | 291 | 75.8 | 1 | 0 | 68.1 | 6 | 14 | 2.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Wake Forest | W 24-16 | 20 | 31 | 202 | 64.5 | 1 | 0 | 56.1 | 7 | 4 | 0.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Boston College | W 14-0 | 15 | 24 | 119 | 62.5 | 1 | 0 | 53 | 6 | 5 | 0.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs South Florida | W 34-14 | 14 | 26 | 163 | 53.8 | 1 | 0 | 51.5 | 8 | -15 | -1.90 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Texas State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 59-16 | 19 | 25 | 302 | 76.0 | 4 | 0 | 69 | 4 | -1 | -0.30 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2011-2014
Opening stop
Florida State
2015
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Notre Dame | 2,703 | 58.7 | 20.7 | 2,703 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 2,703 | 58.7 | 20.7 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | -2,703 |
| 2014 Postseason | Notre Dame | 3,728 | 61.7 | 24 | 3,728 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 3,728 | 61.7 | 24 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Florida State | 1,743 | 57.4 | 17.3 | -1,985 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
435
Primary metric
435 total offense with 51.3 efficiency.
#2
Purdue
279
Primary metric
Win with 279 yards of offense and 61.4 efficiency.
279 total offense with 61.4 efficiency.
#3
North Carolina
368
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
368 total offense with 66.8 efficiency.
#4
Rice
336
Primary metric
Win with 336 yards of offense and 74.5 efficiency.
336 total offense with 74.5 efficiency.
#5
Northwestern
365
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
365 total offense with 70.1 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Notre Dame
3,728 primary output · 61.7 efficiency · 24 usage
65.7
#2
2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame
65.7
3,728 primary · 61.7 efficiency · 24 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Notre Dame
58.9
2,703 primary · 58.7 efficiency · 20.7 usage
17
250+ passing yards
13
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
17
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8969
Myrtle Beach · Myrtle Beach, SC
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
8,174
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.