Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2014Army
RB • 5'8" • Tucson, AZ, USA
Stephen Fraser leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
4
Developing production for a back
Reliability
0
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
14
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Player Story
Stephen Fraser built his college career from 2011 through 2014 as a running back from Tucson, AZ wearing No. 27, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Stephen Fraser's career was his backfield work: 143...
Read the storyStephen Fraser, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Army. Stephen Fraser leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 3 | 77 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 62.7 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 9 | 80 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 53.8 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 5 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 20.4 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Stephen Fraser played RB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Stephen Fraser recorded 143 rushing yards and 40 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Army paired 77 primary output with 55.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 21.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Loss with 17 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Scrimmage Yards / G
5.2
Efficiency
21.9
Usage
2.6
Consistency
19.7
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 0. Stanford: 17. Wake Forest: 0. Boston College: 8. Air Force: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 5 by 35.4. Wake Forest: 1 by 0. Boston College: 2 by 41.7. Air Force: 1 by 10.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
41.7 vs Boston College
Player Story
Stephen Fraser built his college career from 2011 through 2014 as a running back from Tucson, AZ wearing No. 27, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Stephen Fraser's career was his backfield work: 143 rushing yards, 33 carries, and 40 receiving yards across 17 career games in the available record. His career also includes 40 receiving yards and 280 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Stephen Fraser's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 77 | 55.4 | 7.8 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 80 | 53.7 | 1.8 | 3 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 26 | 21.9 | 2.6 | -54 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | -26 |
#1 Featured game
vs Kent State
Week 7 · L 17-31
Loss with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
24
Scrimmage Yards
67.9 takeover
24 scrimmage yards and 1.3 usage.
#2
@ Temple
Week 12 · L 14-42
35
Scrimmage Yards
62.8 takeover
Loss with 35 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
35 scrimmage yards and 9.7 usage.
#3
vs Ball State
Week 9 · L 22-30
16
Scrimmage Yards
57 takeover
Loss with 16 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
16 scrimmage yards and 1.5 usage.
#4
vs Fordham
Week 9 · W 55-0
29
Scrimmage Yards
56 takeover
Win with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
29 scrimmage yards and 8.6 usage.
#5
vs Stanford
Week 3 · L 20-34
17
Scrimmage Yards
52.3 takeover
Loss with 17 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
17 scrimmage yards and 7.5 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Army
77 primary output · 55.4 efficiency · 7.8 usage
62.7
#2
2012 Regular Season · Army
53.8
80 primary · 53.7 efficiency · 1.8 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Army
20.4
26 primary · 21.9 efficiency · 2.6 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.