Player Stats

Cian Slone College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
139
TFL
23
Sacks
11
QB hurries
28
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2023 PostseasonUtah State12210--054.1
2023 Regular SeasonUtah State12265.5274054.1
2024 Regular SeasonUtah State12499.57.55-058.9
2025 PostseasonNC State1360.50--073.7
2025 Regular SeasonNC State13566.51.5161073.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

NC State paired 26.5 primary output with 40.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 40.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah State, NC State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech

Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · NC State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

2.0

Efficiency

40.3

Usage

11.5

Consistency

59.1

Best Game by takeover score

Virginia Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 0.5. East Carolina: 3. Virginia: 1. Wake Forest: 1. Duke: 1. Virginia Tech: 5. Campbell: 3. Notre Dame: 0. Pittsburgh: 2. Georgia Tech: 3. Miami: 0. Florida State: 4. North Carolina: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 6 by 30. East Carolina: 7 by 59.2. Virginia: 4 by 26.7. Wake Forest: 3 by 22.5. Duke: 2 by 18.3. Virginia Tech: 7 by 79.2. Campbell: 5 by 50.8. Notre Dame: 5 by 20.8. Pittsburgh: 2 by 28.3. Georgia Tech: 10 by 71.7. Miami: 4 by 16.7. Florida State: 6 by 65. North Carolina: 1 by 34.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.3 · Games = 8 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.6 · Games = 5 · -0.7 vs Wins