Player Dossier

2025-2025

Lafayette

Carson Persing

WR • 5'7" • 172 lbs • Danville, PA, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Carson Persing reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

Efficiency

43

Consistency

69.3

Season Value

70.8

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Lafayette

25

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
1
Program Path
Lafayette
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Carson Persing, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Lafayette. Carson Persing reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Carson Persing is listed as a WR for Lafayette. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Lafayette paired 45 primary output with 43 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 43 efficiency.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State

Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Lafayette

Games

2

Receiving Yards / G

22.5

Efficiency

43

Usage

Consistency

69.3

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon State

Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 13. Oregon State: 32

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

All Games22.5 · Games = 2

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

2 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Oregon State

Best efficiency game

43.3 vs Bowling Green

Result
Sun 10/19@ Oregon State5326.46.40011
Thu 8/28@ Bowling Green2136.56.50014

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Lafayette

    2025

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2025 Regular SeasonLafayette4543

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Oregon State

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

32

Primary metric

32 receiving yards with a 42.7 efficiency score.

#2

Buffalo

19

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

19 receiving yards with a 31.7 efficiency score.

#3

Bowling Green

13

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

13 receiving yards with a 43.3 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2025 Regular Season · Lafayette

45 primary output · 43 efficiency · usage

70.8

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

1

Career teams

1

Seasons tracked

0

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 3 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.