Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
New Mexico State paired 696 primary output with 49.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2025 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 4 | 696 | 711 | -15 | 6 | 63.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
New Mexico State paired 696 primary output with 49.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 49.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona, New Mexico State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
174
Efficiency
49.2
Usage
16.2
Consistency
69.1
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 0. Tennessee: 145. UTEP: 231. Middle Tennessee: 320
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 1 by 33.3. Tennessee: 22 by 53.1. UTEP: 49 by 53.1. Middle Tennessee: 48 by 57.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.