Player Stats

Kalil Alexander College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
95
TFL
24.5
Sacks
13
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonTexas State4722--018.3
2024 PostseasonTexas State11421--073.2
2024 Regular SeasonTexas State11369552073.2
2025 PostseasonTexas State124111-069.9
2025 Regular SeasonTexas State124410.544-069.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Texas State paired 24 primary output with 37 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 34.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana

Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Texas State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.8

Efficiency

34.6

Usage

10.2

Consistency

70.4

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Rice: 3. Eastern Michigan: 0. UTSA: 1.5. Arizona State: 2.5. Nicholls: 2. Arkansas State: 0. Troy: 2.5. Marshall: 2. Louisiana: 3.5. Southern Miss: 0. UL Monroe: 2.5. South Alabama: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 4 by 46.7. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 5 by 35.8. Arizona State: 6 by 50. Nicholls: 5 by 40.8. Arkansas State: 1 by 4.2. Troy: 5 by 45.8. Marshall: 3 by 32.5. Louisiana: 8 by 68.3. Southern Miss: 4 by 16.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 37.5. South Alabama: 3 by 32.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.6 · Games = 7 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses2.1 · Games = 5 · +0.5 vs Wins