Player Stats

Bishop Fitzgerald College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
148
TFL
10
Sacks
1
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
14
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2023 PostseasonNC State136-0--022.2
2023 Regular SeasonNC State13360.50-3022.2
2024 PostseasonNC State13410-1061.6
2024 Regular SeasonNC State13516027061.6
2025 Regular SeasonUSC10512.51-3252.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

NC State paired 20 primary output with 33 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 32.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across NC State, USC.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · USC

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

32.8

Usage

8.5

Consistency

49

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri State: 2.5. Georgia Southern: 0. Purdue: 2. Michigan State: 0. Illinois: 0. Michigan: 4. Notre Dame: 1. Nebraska: 1. Northwestern: 1. Iowa: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri State: 4 by 41.7. Georgia Southern: 6 by 25. Purdue: 5 by 40.8. Michigan State: 4 by 16.7. Illinois: 6 by 25. Michigan: 5 by 60.8. Notre Dame: 10 by 51.7. Nebraska: 5 by 30.8. Northwestern: 4 by 26.7. Iowa: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 8 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.8 vs Wins