Player Stats

Tyler Lockett College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
3,710
Receptions
249
Touchdowns
35

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonKansas State818246550
2012 PostseasonKansas State13435059.8
2012 Regular SeasonKansas State1340652659.8
2013 PostseasonKansas State1210116381.9
2013 Regular SeasonKansas State12711,146881.9
2014 PostseasonKansas State1313164290
2014 Regular SeasonKansas State13931,3511190

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Kansas State paired 1,515 primary output with 85.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 85.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Kansas State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

116.5

Efficiency

85.2

Usage

38.5

Consistency

74.6

Best Game by takeover score

West Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 164. Stephen F. Austin: 9. Iowa State: 136. Auburn: 45. UTEP: 84. Texas Tech: 125. Oklahoma: 86. Texas: 103. Oklahoma State: 94. TCU: 196. West Virginia: 196. Kansas: 119. Baylor: 158

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 13 by 84.1. Stephen F. Austin: 1 by 60. Iowa State: 6 by 100. Auburn: 6 by 50. UTEP: 4 by 100. Texas Tech: 12 by 69.4. Oklahoma: 6 by 95.6. Texas: 8 by 85.8. Oklahoma State: 6 by 100. TCU: 11 by 100. West Virginia: 10 by 100. Kansas: 9 by 88.1. Baylor: 14 by 75.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins105.8 · Games = 9 · -35.0 vs Losses
Losses140.8 · Games = 4 · +35.0 vs Wins