Player Stats

Aquantis Clemmons College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
21
TFL
3.5
Sacks
0.5
QB hurries
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonRice00-0--0-
2024 Regular SeasonRice34-0--038.4
2025 PostseasonRice10110--051.2
2025 Regular SeasonRice10162.50.52-051.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Rice paired 6 primary output with 13.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 13.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UConn

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Rice

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

13.1

Usage

3.9

Consistency

59.5

Best Game by takeover score

UConn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 1. Louisiana: 1. Charlotte: 1. Navy: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. UTSA: 1. UConn: 1. UAB: 1. North Texas: 0. South Florida: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 1 by 14.2. Louisiana: 2 by 18.3. Charlotte: 2 by 18.3. Navy: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 1 by 14.2. UConn: 3 by 22.5. UAB: 0 by 10. North Texas: 4 by 16.7. South Florida: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 4 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs Wins