Player Stats

Jefferson Adam College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
26
TFL
6.5
Sacks
4.5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonIowa State00-0--0-
2024 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan11266.54.5--047.5
2025 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Eastern Michigan paired 11 primary output with 19.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 19.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Iowa State, Eastern Michigan.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: St. Francis (PA)

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

19.8

Usage

5.3

Consistency

25.8

Best Game by takeover score

St. Francis (PA)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Massachusetts: 0. Washington: 0. Jacksonville State: 0.5. St. Francis (PA): 4. Kent State: 0. Miami (OH): 0.5. Central Michigan: 3. Akron: 0.5. Ohio: 0.5. Buffalo: 2. Western Michigan: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Massachusetts: 2 by 8.3. Washington: 2 by 8.3. Jacksonville State: 3 by 17.5. St. Francis (PA): 3 by 52.5. Kent State: 2 by 8.3. Miami (OH): 2 by 13.3. Central Michigan: 3 by 42.5. Akron: 1 by 9.2. Ohio: 3 by 17.5. Buffalo: 2 by 28.3. Western Michigan: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.5 · Games = 5 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 6 · -0.9 vs Wins