Player Stats

Jake Retzlaff College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
7,879
Passing yards
6,712
Rushing yards
1,167
Touchdowns
62

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2023 Regular SeasonBYU4764648116662.8
2024 PostseasonBYU1318015129071.3
2024 Regular SeasonBYU133,1332,7453882571.3
2025 PostseasonTulane1433030624176.3
2025 Regular SeasonTulane143,4722,8626103076.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Tulane paired 3,802 primary output with 66.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 66.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across BYU, Tulane.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Tulane

Games

14

Primary Metric / G

271.6

Efficiency

66.3

Usage

24.9

Consistency

83.4

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 330. Northwestern: 265. South Alabama: 189. Duke: 356. Ole Miss: 107. Tulsa: 271. East Carolina: 367. Army: 323. UTSA: 257. Memphis: 375. Florida Atlantic: 242. Temple: 239. Charlotte: 287. North Texas: 194

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 46 by 60.1. Northwestern: 41 by 74.7. South Alabama: 37 by 61.7. Duke: 40 by 79.8. Ole Miss: 25 by 55.2. Tulsa: 40 by 63.2. East Carolina: 40 by 75.6. Army: 37 by 78.6. UTSA: 35 by 67.3. Memphis: 33 by 78.1. Florida Atlantic: 34 by 56.9. Temple: 33 by 61.4. Charlotte: 42 by 54.1. North Texas: 37 by 61.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins282.5 · Games = 11 · +51.2 vs Losses
Losses231.3 · Games = 3 · -51.2 vs Wins