Player Dossier

2023-2025

Army

Cale Hellums

QB • 5'10" • 205 lbs • Tomball, TX, USA

Pass-first distributorVolume operator

Cale Hellums is a pass-first distributor with 42.3 usage in the latest tracked season.

Usage Score

42.3

Efficiency

58.4

Consistency

76.1

Season Value

69.2

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Army

23242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
4
Program Path
Army
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Cale Hellums, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Army. Cale Hellums is a pass-first distributor with 42.3 usage in the latest tracked season.

Cale Hellums played QB for Army. Across 3 tracked seasons, Cale Hellums recorded 694 passing yards, 1,243 rushing yards, and 7 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Army.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Army paired 1,909 primary output with 58.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 58.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tulane

Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Army

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

146.8

Efficiency

58.4

Usage

42.3

Consistency

76.1

Best Game by takeover score

Tulane

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UConn: 153. Tarleton State: 39. Kansas State: 167. North Texas: 23. East Carolina: 55. UAB: 122. Charlotte: 193. Tulane: 280. Air Force: 200. Temple: 144. Tulsa: 223. UTSA: 128. Navy: 182

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 23 by 79.4. Tarleton State: 12 by 43.9. Kansas State: 52 by 56.6. North Texas: 11 by 6.4. East Carolina: 12 by 54. UAB: 24 by 68. Charlotte: 25 by 79.5. Tulane: 49 by 77.4. Air Force: 35 by 71.9. Temple: 39 by 59.6. Tulsa: 42 by 55.8. UTSA: 33 by 52.7. Navy: 35 by 54.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins158.1 · Games = 7 · +24.5 vs Losses
Losses133.7 · Games = 6 · -24.5 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Total Offense

Top game by takeover score

Tulane

Best efficiency game

79.5 vs Charlotte

Result
Sat 12/27vs UConn3+ TDW 41-167810887.51079.415453211
Sat 12/13@ NavyDual-threatL 16-175108250.00154.6251004126
Sat 11/29@ UTSADual-threatW 27-244103840.01052.723903.90019
Sat 11/22vs Tulsa3+ TD · Dual-threatL 25-266106460.00155.8321595331
Sat 11/8vs TempleDual-threatW 14-13132633.30059.6361183.30112
Sat 11/1@ Air ForceDual-threatW 20-175910255.61071.926983.80112
Sat 10/18@ TulaneDual-threatL 17-2471012570.00077.4391554216
Sat 10/11vs CharlotteDual-threatW 24-7245050.00079.5211436.80250
Sat 10/4@ UAB3+ TD · Dual-threatW 31-13134133.3006821813.90313
Thu 9/25@ East CarolinaL 6-28131333.300549424.70021
Sat 9/20vs North TexasL 38-450200.0016.49232.60010
Sat 9/6@ Kansas State3+ TD · Dual-threatW 24-217114363.61056.6411243216
Fri 8/29vs Tarleton StateL 27-3014225.00043.98374.60116

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Army

    2023-2025

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

2023202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2023 Regular SeasonArmy0
2024 Regular SeasonArmy2838.34.628
2025 PostseasonArmy1,90958.442.31,881
2025 Regular SeasonArmy1,90958.442.30

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Tulane

Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

280

Primary metric

280 total offense with 77.4 efficiency.

#2

Air Force

200

Primary metric

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

200 total offense with 71.9 efficiency.

#3

Tulsa

223

Primary metric

Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

223 total offense with 55.8 efficiency.

#4

Navy

182

Primary metric

Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

182 total offense with 54.6 efficiency.

#5

Charlotte

193

Primary metric

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

193 total offense with 79.5 efficiency.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2025 Postseason · Army

1,909 primary output · 58.4 efficiency · 42.3 usage

69.2

#2

2025 Regular Season · Army

69.2

1,909 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 42.3 usage

#3

2024 Regular Season · Army

18.4

28 primary · 38.3 efficiency · 4.6 usage

Milestones

0

250+ passing yards

0

300+ total offense

4

3+ TD games

6

Above avg efficiency

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

1

Career teams

4

Seasons tracked

1,937

Career Total Offense

Data Context

Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 16 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.