Usage Score
42.3
Player Dossier
2023-2025Army
QB • 5'10" • 205 lbs • Tomball, TX, USA
Cale Hellums is a pass-first distributor with 42.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
42.3
Efficiency
58.4
Consistency
76.1
Season Value
69.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cale Hellums, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Army. Cale Hellums is a pass-first distributor with 42.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Cale Hellums played QB for Army. Across 3 tracked seasons, Cale Hellums recorded 694 passing yards, 1,243 rushing yards, and 7 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Army paired 1,909 primary output with 58.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 58.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
146.8
Efficiency
58.4
Usage
42.3
Consistency
76.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: 153. Tarleton State: 39. Kansas State: 167. North Texas: 23. East Carolina: 55. UAB: 122. Charlotte: 193. Tulane: 280. Air Force: 200. Temple: 144. Tulsa: 223. UTSA: 128. Navy: 182
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 23 by 79.4. Tarleton State: 12 by 43.9. Kansas State: 52 by 56.6. North Texas: 11 by 6.4. East Carolina: 12 by 54. UAB: 24 by 68. Charlotte: 25 by 79.5. Tulane: 49 by 77.4. Air Force: 35 by 71.9. Temple: 39 by 59.6. Tulsa: 42 by 55.8. UTSA: 33 by 52.7. Navy: 35 by 54.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
79.5 vs Charlotte
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs UConn3+ TD | W 41-16 | 7 | 8 | 108 | 87.5 | 1 | 0 | 79.4 | 15 | 45 | 3 | 2 | 11 |
| Sat 12/13 | @ NavyDual-threat | L 16-17 | 5 | 10 | 82 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 54.6 | 25 | 100 | 4 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ UTSADual-threat | W 27-24 | 4 | 10 | 38 | 40.0 | 1 | 0 | 52.7 | 23 | 90 | 3.90 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Tulsa3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 25-26 | 6 | 10 | 64 | 60.0 | 0 | 1 | 55.8 | 32 | 159 | 5 | 3 | 31 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs TempleDual-threat | W 14-13 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 59.6 | 36 | 118 | 3.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Air ForceDual-threat | W 20-17 | 5 | 9 | 102 | 55.6 | 1 | 0 | 71.9 | 26 | 98 | 3.80 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ TulaneDual-threat | L 17-24 | 7 | 10 | 125 | 70.0 | 0 | 0 | 77.4 | 39 | 155 | 4 | 2 | 16 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs CharlotteDual-threat | W 24-7 | 2 | 4 | 50 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 79.5 | 21 | 143 | 6.80 | 2 | 50 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ UAB3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 31-13 | 1 | 3 | 41 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 21 | 81 | 3.90 | 3 | 13 |
| Thu 9/25 | @ East Carolina | L 6-28 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 9 | 42 | 4.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs North Texas | L 38-45 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 6.4 | 9 | 23 | 2.60 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Kansas State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 24-21 | 7 | 11 | 43 | 63.6 | 1 | 0 | 56.6 | 41 | 124 | 3 | 2 | 16 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Tarleton State | L 27-30 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 43.9 | 8 | 37 | 4.60 | 1 | 16 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Army | 28 | 38.3 | 4.6 | 28 |
| 2025 Postseason | Army | 1,909 | 58.4 | 42.3 | 1,881 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Army | 1,909 | 58.4 | 42.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
280
Primary metric
280 total offense with 77.4 efficiency.
#2
Air Force
200
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
200 total offense with 71.9 efficiency.
#3
Tulsa
223
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
223 total offense with 55.8 efficiency.
#4
Navy
182
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
182 total offense with 54.6 efficiency.
#5
Charlotte
193
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
193 total offense with 79.5 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Army
1,909 primary output · 58.4 efficiency · 42.3 usage
69.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Army
69.2
1,909 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 42.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Army
18.4
28 primary · 38.3 efficiency · 4.6 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
4
3+ TD games
6
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,937
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 16 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.