Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 379 primary output with 45 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Michigan State | 3 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 26.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Michigan State | 12 | 379 | 297 | 82 | 4 | 61.3 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 379 primary output with 45 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with 63 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
31.6
Efficiency
45
Usage
12.2
Consistency
65.4
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 52. Boston College: 35. Youngstown State: 41. USC: 12. Nebraska: 28. UCLA: 16. Indiana: 13. Michigan: 8. Minnesota: 51. Penn State: 6. Iowa: 63. Maryland: 54
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 7 by 77.4. Boston College: 5 by 74.5. Youngstown State: 9 by 46.7. USC: 6 by 20.8. Nebraska: 6 by 24.4. UCLA: 4 by 27.1. Indiana: 3 by 27.4. Michigan: 3 by 17.4. Minnesota: 14 by 37.9. Penn State: 1 by 62.5. Iowa: 9 by 72.9. Maryland: 12 by 50.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.