Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas State paired 796 primary output with 65 efficiency.
Player Stats
Greg Burrell College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 1,178
- Rushing yards
- 1,041
- Receiving yards
- 137
- Touchdowns
- 6
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | UNLV | 11 | 382 | 370 | 12 | 3 | 43.6 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas State | 12 | 81 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 68.7 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas State | 12 | 715 | 590 | 125 | 3 | 68.7 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 65 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UNLV, Texas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Loss with 136 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas State
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
66.3
Efficiency
65
Usage
14.9
Consistency
67.6
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 81. Eastern Michigan: 110. Arizona State: 19. Nicholls: 39. Arkansas State: 64. Troy: 136. Marshall: 41. James Madison: 30. Louisiana: 15. Southern Miss: 102. UL Monroe: 77. South Alabama: 82
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 9 by 87.5. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 100. Arizona State: 5 by 39.6. Nicholls: 6 by 67.7. Arkansas State: 12 by 41. Troy: 13 by 93.6. Marshall: 10 by 38.2. James Madison: 11 by 29.5. Louisiana: 3 by 52.1. Southern Miss: 12 by 85.4. UL Monroe: 9 by 83.3. South Alabama: 14 by 61.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins81.8 · Games = 6 · +31.0 vs Losses
Losses50.8 · Games = 6 · -31.0 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Greg Burrell
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.