Player Stats

DJ Butler College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
497
Rushing yards
403
Receiving yards
94

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2024 Regular SeasonHouston713810236034.3
2025 PostseasonHouston1128217059.1
2025 Regular SeasonHouston1133128051059.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Houston paired 359 primary output with 46.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 46.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UCF

Win with 77 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Houston

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

32.6

Efficiency

46.5

Usage

10.9

Consistency

58.7

Best Game by takeover score

UCF

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 28. Stephen F. Austin: 29. Rice: 11. Oregon State: 17. Oklahoma State: 26. Arizona: 7. Arizona State: 19. West Virginia: 34. UCF: 77. TCU: 46. Baylor: 65

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 9 by 29.4. Stephen F. Austin: 5 by 60.4. Rice: 4 by 28.6. Oregon State: 3 by 59. Oklahoma State: 6 by 39.3. Arizona: 2 by 36.5. Arizona State: 4 by 49.5. West Virginia: 6 by 54.9. UCF: 16 by 50.9. TCU: 10 by 44.9. Baylor: 11 by 57.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins31 · Games = 9 · -9 vs Losses
Losses40 · Games = 2 · +9 vs Wins