Usage Score
12.8
Player Dossier
2024-2025East Carolina
WR • 5'11" • 181 lbs • Florence, SC, USA
Jyron Waiters reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.8
Efficiency
80.4
Consistency
76.3
Season Value
67.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · East Carolina
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jyron Waiters, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · East Carolina. Jyron Waiters reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jyron Waiters played WR for East Carolina. Across 2 tracked seasons, Jyron Waiters recorded 69 receiving yards and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with East Carolina.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
East Carolina paired 69 primary output with 80.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
23
Efficiency
80.4
Usage
12.8
Consistency
76.3
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 21. Unknown: 32. Charlotte: 16
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 2 by 70. Unknown: 3 by 71.1. Charlotte: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Charlotte
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
East Carolina
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2025 Postseason | East Carolina | 69 | 80.4 | 12.8 | 69 |
| 2025 Regular Season | East Carolina | 69 | 80.4 | 12.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#3
Charlotte
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · East Carolina
69 primary output · 80.4 efficiency · 12.8 usage
67.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · East Carolina
67.4
69 primary · 80.4 efficiency · 12.8 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · East Carolina
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8411
Wilson · Florence, SC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
69
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 3 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.