Usage Score
14.9
Player Dossier
2024-2025Tulane
Jamauri McClure
RB • 5'10" • 190 lbs • Goshen, AL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Jamauri McClure leans balanced backfield option traits and 54.6 efficiency.
Efficiency
54.6
Consistency
46.9
Season Value
54.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane
24242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamauri McClure, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane. Jamauri McClure leans balanced backfield option traits and 54.6 efficiency.
Jamauri McClure played RB for Tulane. Across 2 tracked seasons, Jamauri McClure recorded 661 rushing yards, 32 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Tulane.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Tulane paired 548 primary output with 54.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 54.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with 122 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Tulane
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
54.8
Efficiency
54.6
Usage
14.9
Consistency
46.9
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 84. Ole Miss: 19. Tulsa: 17. East Carolina: -1. UTSA: -3. Memphis: 14. Florida Atlantic: 94. Temple: 122. Charlotte: 69. North Texas: 133
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 15 by 58.3. Ole Miss: 3 by 66. Tulsa: 2 by 85.4. East Carolina: 1 by 0. UTSA: 1 by 0. Memphis: 3 by 48.6. Florida Atlantic: 10 by 89.2. Temple: 17 by 74.8. Charlotte: 11 by 65.3. North Texas: 23 by 58.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins64 · Games = 7 · +30.7 vs Losses
Losses33.3 · Games = 3 · -30.7 vs Wins
First Half23.2 · Games = 5 · -63.2 vs Second Half
Second Half86.4 · Games = 5 · +63.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
89.2 vs Florida Atlantic
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-41 | 15 | 84 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs North Texas100 rush yards | W 34-21 | 22 | 121 | 5.50 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5.8 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Charlotte | W 27-0 | 11 | 69 | 6.30 | 0 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Temple100 rush yards | W 37-13 | 17 | 122 | 7.20 | 0 | — | — | 7.2 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 35-24 | 10 | 94 | 9.40 | 1 | — | — | 9.4 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Memphis | W 38-32 | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Thu 10/30 | @ UTSA | L 26-48 | — | — | — | — | 1 | -3 | -3 |
| Thu 10/9 | vs East Carolina | W 26-19 | — | — | — | — | 1 | -1 | -1 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Tulsa | W 31-14 | 2 | 17 | 8.50 | 0 | — | — | 8.5 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-45 | 3 | 19 | 6.30 | 0 | — | — | 6.3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Postseason | Tulane | 145 | 52.9 | 8.9 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tulane | 145 | 52.9 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Tulane | 548 | 54.6 | 14.9 | 403 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulane | 548 | 54.6 | 14.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with 108 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
108
Primary metric
108 scrimmage yards and 17.2 usage.
#2
Temple
122
Primary metric
Win with 122 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
122 scrimmage yards and 30.4 usage.
#3
North Texas
133
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
133 scrimmage yards and 35.4 usage.
#4
Florida Atlantic
94
Primary metric
Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
94 scrimmage yards and 18.2 usage.
#5
Ole Miss
84
Primary metric
Loss with 84 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
84 scrimmage yards and 27.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Tulane
548 primary output · 54.6 efficiency · 14.9 usage
54.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · Tulane
54.1
548 primary · 54.6 efficiency · 14.9 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Tulane
29.1
145 primary · 52.9 efficiency · 8.9 usage
Milestones
3
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8583
Goshen · Goshen, AL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
693
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.