Usage Score
16.7
Player Dossier
2011-2014Tulane
Justyn Shackleford
WR • 5'11" • Decatur, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Justyn Shackleford reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80
Consistency
49.8
Season Value
61.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Tulane
1112131314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justyn Shackleford, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Tulane. Justyn Shackleford reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Tulane paired 465 primary output with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
42.3
Efficiency
80
Usage
16.7
Consistency
49.8
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 113. Georgia Tech: 62. Unknown: 76. Duke: 23. Rutgers: 21. UConn: 31. UCF: 16. Cincinnati: 9. Houston: 31. Memphis: 37. East Carolina: 46
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 8 by 94.2. Georgia Tech: 5 by 82.7. Unknown: 4 by 100. Duke: 2 by 76.7. Rutgers: 1 by 100. UConn: 2 by 100. UCF: 2 by 53.3. Cincinnati: 1 by 60. Houston: 4 by 51.7. Memphis: 4 by 61.7. East Carolina: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins31 · n=2 · -9.9 vs Losses
Losses40.9 · n=8 · +9.9 vs Wins
First Half54.3 · n=6 · +26.5 vs Second Half
Second Half27.8 · n=5 · -26.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | @ East Carolina | L 6-34 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Memphis | L 7-38 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Houston | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Cincinnati | L 14-38 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ UCF | L 13-20 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs UConn | W 12-3 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Rutgers | L 6-31 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Duke | L 13-47 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Georgia Tech | L 21-38 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 1 | 27 |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-38 | — | 8 | 113 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201320132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulane | 404 | 71.8 | 13.9 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulane | 431 | 78.2 | 16.6 | 27 |
| 2013 Postseason | Tulane | 419 | 70.9 | 21.3 | -12 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulane | 419 | 70.9 | 21.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulane | 465 | 80 | 16.7 | 46 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 94.2 efficiency score.
#2
Syracuse
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
130
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
65
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Duke
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Tulane
465 primary output · 80 efficiency · 16.7 usage
61.5
#2
2011 Regular Season · Tulane
59.2
404 primary · 71.8 efficiency · 13.9 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Tulane
57.9
419 primary · 70.9 efficiency · 21.3 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7667
Berkmar · Lilburn, GA
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,719
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.