Usage Score
6.3
Player Dossier
2011-2014Tulane
Marc Edwards
WR • 6'1" • New Orleans, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Marc Edwards reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
26.7
Consistency
100
Season Value
33.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Tulane
11121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marc Edwards, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Tulane. Marc Edwards reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Tulane paired 264 primary output with 55.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 26.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
4
Efficiency
26.7
Usage
6.3
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
26.7 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | vs UTEP | W 45-3 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulane | 264 | 55.8 | 8.3 | 264 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulane | 4 | 26.7 | 6.3 | -260 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | -4 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96
Primary metric
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
4
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#4
UL Monroe
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
UAB
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 51.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Tulane
264 primary output · 55.8 efficiency · 8.3 usage
48.8
#2
2013 Regular Season · Tulane
33.6
4 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Tulane
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8361
St. Augustine · New Orleans, LA
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
268
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.