Player Stats

Brayden Roggow College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
110
Passing yards
100
Rushing yards
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2024 Regular SeasonAkron1990046
2025 Regular SeasonAkron31019110066.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Akron paired 101 primary output with 75.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 75.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Toledo

Loss with 51 yards of offense and 64.6 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Akron

Games

3

Primary Metric / G

33.7

Efficiency

75.6

Usage

8.8

Consistency

71.7

Best Game by takeover score

Toledo

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duquesne: 40. Toledo: 51. Massachusetts: 10

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duquesne: 7 by 67.7. Toledo: 12 by 64.6. Massachusetts: 1 by 94.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins25 · Games = 2 · -26 vs Losses
Losses51 · Games = 1 · +26 vs Wins