Usage Score
12.1
Player Dossier
2024-2025Oklahoma State
Shamar Rigby
WR • 6'3" • 190 lbs • St. Petersburg, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Shamar Rigby reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.5
Consistency
59
Season Value
57.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Purdue • Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shamar Rigby, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma State. Shamar Rigby reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Shamar Rigby played WR for Purdue and Oklahoma State. Across 2 tracked seasons, Shamar Rigby recorded 71 passing yards, 5 rushing yards, and 464 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Oklahoma State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Oklahoma State paired 351 primary output with 73.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Oklahoma State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
31.9
Efficiency
73.5
Usage
12.1
Consistency
59
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 50. Oregon: 7. Tulsa: 9. Baylor: 84. Arizona: 4. Houston: 17. Cincinnati: 48. Kansas: 31. Kansas State: 36. UCF: 13. Iowa State: 52
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. Oregon: 1 by 46.7. Tulsa: 2 by 30. Baylor: 5 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 26.7. Houston: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. Kansas: 3 by 68.9. Kansas State: 3 by 80. UCF: 1 by 86.7. Iowa State: 5 by 69.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses30.1 · Games = 10
First Half28.5 · Games = 6 · -7.5 vs Second Half
Second Half36 · Games = 5 · +7.5 vs First Half
All Games31.9 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Iowa State | L 13-20 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ UCF | L 14-17 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Kansas State | L 6-14 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Kansas | L 21-38 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-49 | — | 1 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Houston | L 17-39 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Arizona | L 13-41 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Baylor | L 27-45 | — | 5 | 84 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 39 |
| Fri 9/19 | vs Tulsa | L 12-19 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Oregon | L 3-69 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 41 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2024
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Purdue | 113 | 58.8 | 8.2 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 351 | 73.5 | 12.1 | 238 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84
Primary metric
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Penn State
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
50
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Cincinnati
48
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
351 primary output · 73.5 efficiency · 12.1 usage
57.2
#2
2024 Regular Season · Purdue
37.9
113 primary · 58.8 efficiency · 8.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8753
Clearwater Central Catholic · Clearwater, FL
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
2
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
464
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 20 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.