Player Stats

Charlie Becker College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
679
Receptions
34
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2024 Regular SeasonIndiana2-0150.1
2025 PostseasonIndiana148164273.3
2025 Regular SeasonIndiana1426515273.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Indiana paired 679 primary output with 88.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 88.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Indiana

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

48.5

Efficiency

88.9

Usage

16.3

Consistency

50.2

Best Game by takeover score

Ohio State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 65. Oregon: 48. Alabama: 51. Old Dominion: 4. Kennesaw State: 35. Indiana State: 31. Iowa: 0. Oregon: 0. UCLA: 35. Maryland: 52. Penn State: 118. Wisconsin: 108. Purdue: 6. Ohio State: 126

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 4 by 100. Oregon: 2 by 100. Alabama: 2 by 100. Old Dominion: 1 by 26.7. Kennesaw State: 2 by 100. Indiana State: 1 by 100. UCLA: 2 by 100. Maryland: 1 by 100. Penn State: 7 by 100. Wisconsin: 5 by 100. Purdue: 1 by 40. Ohio State: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half33.4 · Games = 7 · -30.1 vs Second Half
Second Half63.6 · Games = 7 · +30.1 vs First Half