Player Stats

Alessio Milivojevic College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
1,208
Passing yards
1,267
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2024 Regular SeasonMichigan State1000033.3
2025 Regular SeasonMichigan State91,2081,267-591159.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Michigan State paired 1,208 primary output with 56.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 56.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota

Loss with 258 yards of offense and 66 efficiency. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Michigan State

Games

9

Primary Metric / G

134.2

Efficiency

56.9

Usage

12.5

Consistency

53.6

Best Game by takeover score

Minnesota

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 0. Nebraska: 72. UCLA: 109. Indiana: 59. Michigan: 53. Minnesota: 258. Penn State: 108. Iowa: 244. Maryland: 305

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 1 by 0. Nebraska: 8 by 70.1. UCLA: 19 by 70.2. Indiana: 7 by 72.1. Michigan: 8 by 66.7. Minnesota: 41 by 66. Penn State: 33 by 50.6. Iowa: 45 by 50.1. Maryland: 42 by 66.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins152.5 · Games = 2 · +23.5 vs Losses
Losses129 · Games = 7 · -23.5 vs Wins