Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Nebraska paired 1,922 primary output with 63.5 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Nebraska | 13 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 21.2 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Nebraska | 13 | 162 | 151 | 11 | 3 | 21.2 |
| 2012 Postseason | Nebraska | 14 | 48 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 68.8 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Nebraska | 14 | 1,267 | 1,089 | 178 | 11 | 68.8 |
| 2013 Postseason | Nebraska | 13 | 122 | 122 | 0 | 1 | 86.2 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Nebraska | 13 | 1,800 | 1,568 | 232 | 10 | 86.2 |
| 2014 Postseason | Nebraska | 13 | 149 | 88 | 61 | 1 | 82 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Nebraska | 13 | 1,731 | 1,523 | 208 | 21 | 82 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Nebraska paired 1,922 primary output with 63.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 59.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with 251 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
144.6
Efficiency
59.3
Usage
37.3
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 149. Florida Atlantic: 241. McNeese: 150. Fresno State: 110. Miami: 232. Illinois: 208. Michigan State: 67. Northwestern: 159. Rutgers: 251. Purdue: 1. Wisconsin: 95. Minnesota: 98. Iowa: 119
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 33 by 39.2. Florida Atlantic: 22 by 95.6. McNeese: 20 by 51.1. Fresno State: 19 by 60.3. Miami: 36 by 67.7. Illinois: 22 by 89.4. Michigan State: 26 by 22.5. Northwestern: 27 by 64.2. Rutgers: 21 by 99.8. Purdue: 6 by 1.7. Wisconsin: 19 by 44.8. Minnesota: 20 by 51. Iowa: 15 by 83.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.