Usage Score
23.3
Player Profile
Jakeem Grant
WR • 5'7" • Mesquite, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jakeem Grant reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.8
Consistency
59.6
Season Value
65.4
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Texas Tech
1112121313141515
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Primary stop by seasons
- Texas Tech
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Texas Tech
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Jakeem Grant, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Texas Tech. Jakeem Grant reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 1,268 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
97.5
Efficiency
80.8
Usage
23.3
Consistency
59.6
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 125. Unknown: 71. UTEP: 141. Arkansas: 75. TCU: 126. Baylor: 69. Iowa State: 166. Kansas: 71. Oklahoma: 55. Oklahoma State: 178. West Virginia: 8. Kansas State: 78. Texas: 105
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 10 by 83.3. Unknown: 6 by 78.9. UTEP: 7 by 100. Arkansas: 8 by 62.5. TCU: 8 by 100. Baylor: 6 by 76.7. Iowa State: 9 by 100. Kansas: 5 by 94.7. Oklahoma: 7 by 52.4. Oklahoma State: 13 by 91.3. West Virginia: 5 by 10.7. Kansas State: 4 by 100. Texas: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins106 · n=6 · +12.5 vs Losses
Losses93.5 · n=6 · -12.5 vs Wins
First Half110.4 · n=7 · +27.9 vs Second Half
Second Half82.5 · n=6 · -27.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/30 | vs LSU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-56 | — | 10 | 125 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 3 | 46 |
| Fri 11/27 | @ Texas100 receiving yards | W 48-45 | — | 2 | 105 | 36.8 | 52.50 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Kansas State | W 59-44 | — | 4 | 78 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 53 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ West Virginia | L 26-31 | — | 5 | 8 | 1.6 | 1.60 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Oklahoma State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 53-70 | — | 13 | 178 | 12.6 | 13.70 | 1 | 90 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Oklahoma | L 27-63 | — | 7 | 55 | 7.9 | 7.90 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Kansas | W 30-20 | — | 5 | 71 | 13.1 | 14.20 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Iowa State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 66-31 | — | 9 | 166 | 17.2 | 18.40 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Baylor | L 35-63 | — | 6 | 69 | 9.4 | 11.50 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs TCU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 52-55 | — | 8 | 126 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ ArkansasHigh volume | W 35-24 | — | 8 | 75 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs UTEP100 receiving yards | W 69-20 | — | 7 | 141 | 20.1 | 20.10 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 71 | 10.6 | 11.80 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201220132013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Texas Tech | 284 | 57.1 | 9.4 | 284 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 284 | 57.1 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas Tech | 796 | 80 | 17.2 | 512 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 796 | 80 | 17.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 938 | 79.3 | 20.7 | 142 |
| 2015 Postseason | Texas Tech | 1,268 | 80.8 | 23.3 | 330 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 1,268 | 80.8 | 23.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150
Primary metric
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
178
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
178 receiving yards with a 91.3 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa State
166
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
166 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Baylor
155
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas State
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Texas Tech
1,268 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 23.3 usage
65.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · Texas Tech
65.4
1,268 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 23.3 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Texas Tech
60.9
796 primary · 80 efficiency · 17.2 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8389
Horn · Mesquite, TX
- Committed To
- Texas Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,286
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.