Usage Score
23.9
Player Dossier
2011-2013Texas Tech
Jace Amaro
TE • 6'5" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jace Amaro reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.9
Consistency
75.7
Season Value
71.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Texas Tech
1112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jace Amaro, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Texas Tech. Jace Amaro reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 1,352 primary output with 84.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
104
Efficiency
84.9
Usage
23.9
Consistency
75.7
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 112. SMU: 42. Unknown: 142. TCU: 97. Texas State: 86. Kansas: 96. Iowa State: 143. West Virginia: 136. Oklahoma: 119. Oklahoma State: 174. Kansas State: 67. Baylor: 55. Texas: 83
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 8 by 93.3. SMU: 3 by 93.3. Unknown: 8 by 100. TCU: 9 by 71.9. Texas State: 9 by 63.7. Kansas: 9 by 71.1. Iowa State: 9 by 100. West Virginia: 9 by 100. Oklahoma: 8 by 99.2. Oklahoma State: 15 by 77.3. Kansas State: 9 by 49.6. Baylor: 4 by 91.7. Texas: 6 by 92.2
Split Comparison
Wins101.7 · n=7 · +2.1 vs Losses
Losses99.6 · n=5 · -2.1 vs Wins
First Half102.6 · n=7 · -3.1 vs Second Half
Second Half105.7 · n=6 · +3.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-23 | — | 8 | 112 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 23 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ Texas | L 16-41 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Baylor2+ TD | L 34-63 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Kansas StateHigh volume | L 26-49 | — | 9 | 67 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Oklahoma State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-52 | — | 15 | 174 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Oklahoma100 receiving yards · High volume | L 30-38 | — | 8 | 119 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-27 | — | 9 | 136 | 15.1 | 15.10 | 2 | 37 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Iowa State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-35 | — | 9 | 143 | 15.9 | 15.90 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ KansasHigh volume | W 54-16 | — | 9 | 96 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Texas StateHigh volume | W 33-7 | — | 9 | 86 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Thu 9/12 | vs TCUHigh volume | W 20-10 | — | 9 | 97 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 8 | 142 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ SMU | W 41-23 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 57 | 49.2 | 5.6 | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Texas Tech | 409 | 81.6 | 11.3 | 352 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 409 | 81.6 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas Tech | 1,352 | 84.9 | 23.9 | 943 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 1,352 | 84.9 | 23.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
156
Primary metric
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
174
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
174 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa State
143
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
142
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
West Virginia
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Texas Tech
1,352 primary output · 84.9 efficiency · 23.9 usage
71.1
#2
2013 Regular Season · Texas Tech
71.1
1,352 primary · 84.9 efficiency · 23.9 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Texas Tech
46.7
409 primary · 81.6 efficiency · 11.3 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9437
MacArthur · San Antonio, TX
- Committed To
- Texas Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,818
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.