Player Stats

Dawan Scott College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,869
Receptions
123
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)1220424251
2012 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)1157851876.5
2013 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)1128425269.8
2014 Regular SeasonMiami (OH)1018169645.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

Miami (OH) paired 851 primary output with 80.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 66.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Miami (OH)

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

16.9

Efficiency

66.2

Usage

15.6

Consistency

44.4

Best Game by takeover score

Western Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 42. Eastern Kentucky: 11. Michigan: 27. Cincinnati: 21. Buffalo: 7. Northern Illinois: 0. Kent State: 12. Western Michigan: 36. Central Michigan: 0. Ohio: 13

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 5 by 56. Eastern Kentucky: 1 by 73.3. Michigan: 3 by 60. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. Buffalo: 1 by 46.7. Kent State: 3 by 26.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 80. Ohio: 1 by 86.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins12 · Games = 1 · -5.4 vs Losses
Losses17.4 · Games = 9 · +5.4 vs Wins