Usage Score
28.3
Player Dossier
2011-2014Miami (OH)
David Frazier
WR • 6'0" • Columbia, SC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
David Frazier reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.3
Consistency
72.5
Season Value
71.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
11121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Miami (OH)
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Frazier, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Miami (OH). David Frazier reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Miami (OH) paired 949 primary output with 87.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 87.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
86.3
Efficiency
87.3
Usage
28.3
Consistency
72.5
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 109. Unknown: 106. Michigan: 52. Cincinnati: 162. Buffalo: 97. Massachusetts: 49. Akron: 132. Northern Illinois: 87. Kent State: 19. Central Michigan: 88. Ohio: 48
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 6 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 100. Michigan: 4 by 86.7. Cincinnati: 5 by 100. Buffalo: 4 by 100. Massachusetts: 5 by 65.3. Akron: 9 by 97.8. Northern Illinois: 7 by 82.9. Kent State: 2 by 63.3. Central Michigan: 5 by 100. Ohio: 5 by 64
Split Comparison
Wins34 · n=2 · -62.9 vs Losses
Losses96.9 · n=8 · +62.9 vs Wins
First Half95.8 · n=6 · +21.0 vs Second Half
Second Half74.8 · n=5 · -21.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/26 | vs Ohio | L 21-24 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Central Michigan | L 27-34 | — | 5 | 88 | 15.5 | 17.60 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Kent State | W 10-3 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Northern Illinois | L 41-51 | — | 7 | 87 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Akron100 receiving yards · High volume | L 19-29 | — | 9 | 132 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Massachusetts | W 42-41 | — | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Buffalo | L 27-35 | — | 4 | 97 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Cincinnati100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 24-31 | — | 5 | 162 | 32.4 | 32.40 | 2 | 74 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Michigan | L 10-34 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 7 | 106 | 15.1 | 15.10 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Marshall100 receiving yards | L 27-42 | — | 6 | 109 | 18.2 | 18.20 | 0 | 47 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami (OH)
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 259 | 65 | 13.3 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 151 | 83.3 | 10.8 | -108 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 302 | 71.3 | 28.5 | 151 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 949 | 87.3 | 28.3 | 647 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162
Primary metric
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Buffalo
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
132
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#4
Central Michigan
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Akron
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
949 primary output · 87.3 efficiency · 28.3 usage
71.7
#2
2013 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
46.5
302 primary · 71.3 efficiency · 28.5 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
45.5
151 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 10.8 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
Irmo · Columbia, SC
- Committed To
- Miami (OH)
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,661
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.